Link to Website of INCITS M1 (includes all documents, minutes, and organizational member information)
See Executive Summary
Link to INCITS M1 area on the INCITS Projects Database
See Significant Accomplishments
See Significant Challenges
See Expected Challenges
See Committee Activities
See previous year's meetings
See next year's planned meetings
See Liaison Activities
INCITS M1 Membership and Officers
See Future Trends and Related Technical Activities
See Other Administrative Information
The purpose of INCITS M1 is
to ensure a high priority, focused, and comprehensive approach in the United
States for the rapid development and approval of formal national and
international generic biometric standards. These standards are considered to be
critical for U.S. needs, such as homeland defense, the prevention of identity
theft and for other government and commercial applications based on biometric
personal authentication. The current program of work includes: biometric data
interchange formats, exchange format frameworks, Application Programming
Interfaces, application profiles, conformance testing methodology standards for
the biometric data interchange formats, a conformance testing methodology for
the BioAPI standard, and performance testing and reporting standards. INCITS M1
is the U.S. Technical Advisory Group (TAG) to ISO/IEC Joint Technical Commitee 1
(JTC 1) Subcommittee SC 37 - Biometrics which is developing a similar portfolio
of biometric standards.
Since its establishment in November 2001, INCITS M1 has
maintained an accelerated pace of biometric standards development. Biometric
standardization is of very high priority for the
| M1 Standing Document 1 (SD1) | Posting of M1 Documents in the M1 Document Register |
| M1 Standing Document 2 (SD2) | M1 Standing Document 2 (CBEFF type codes) |
| M1
Standing Document 3 (SD3) |
M1 Rules for SC37 and SC37/WG
Participation - (Password
Protected) |
| M1 Standing
Document 4 (SD4) |
M1 Report on Issues for Harmonizing Conformity Assessment to Biometric Standards |
A brief description of the INCITS M1 Task Groups and their current program of work ("D" projects) follows:
M1.2, the Task Group on Biometric Technical
Interfaces, chaired by Fred Herr, ID Technology Partners, covers the
standardization of all necessary interfaces and interactions between biometric
components and sub-systems, including the possible use of security mechanisms to
protect stored data and data transferred between systems. M1.2 will also
consider the need for a reference model for the architecture and operation of
biometric systems in order to identify the standards that are needed to support
multi-vendor systems and their applications. M1.2 serves as the US TAG to the
JTC 1 SC 37 Working Group 2 on Biometric Technical Interfaces. M1.2 has
twenty-three members. Eighteen are Voting
Members and five are Advisory Members. The following "D" projects
are under development in M1.2:
1703-D, Information
technology - Conformance Testing Methodology for ANSI INCITS 358-2002, BioAPI
Specification.
M1.2 has maintanence responsibility for the following "M" projects:
1538-M - INCITS 358-2002 American National Standard
for Information
technology - The BioAPI Specification
16223-M - INCITS 398-2005 American National Standard
for Information
technology - Common Biometric Exchange Formats Framework
(CBEFF)
M1.3, the Task Group on
Biometric Data Interchange Formats, chaired by Dr. Creed Jones, Sagem
Morpho Inc, focuses on the standardization of the content, meaning and
representation of biometric data interchange formats. It is also addressing the
development of conformance testing methodologies for most of the biometric data
interchange standards. INCITS M1.3 serves as the US TAG to the JTC 1 SC 37
Working Group 3 Biometric
Data Interchange Formats. M1.3 has thirty-one members. M1.3 had two Ad-Hoc Groups
during this period. The Ad-Hoc Group on Biometric Sample Quality chaired
by Mr. David Benini, Aware, Inc. is addressing means of quality and ways of
expressing and interpreting the quality of a biometric sample. This group has
been re-authorized every two meetings of M1.3 and it is expected to conclude the
work by presenting a final report at the June 2005 meeting of M1.3. There are twenty-eight Voting Members and three are
Advisory Members. The following "D" projects
are under development in M1.3:
Part 1 -
Generalized
Conformance Testing Methodology
Part 3 -
Conformance Testing
Methodology for INCITS 377, Finger Pattern Based Data Interchange
Format
Part 4 - Conformance Testing Methodology for
INCITS 381, Finger Image Data Interchange Format
Part 5 - Conformance Testing
Methodology for INCITS 385, Face Recognition Format for Data Interchange
Part
6 -Conformance Testing Methodology for INCITS 379, Iris Image Interchange
Format
Project 1704-D: Conformance Testing, Finger Minutiae is proposed as Part 2 of the multi-part standard.
The project proposal is for consideration at the June 2005 meeting.
M1.3 has maintenance
responsibility for the following "M" projects:
1577-M - INCITS 381-2004 American National Standard for Information technology - Finger Image Based Interchange Format (approval date: May 13, 2004)
1643-M - INCITS 396-2005 American National Standard for Information technology - Hand Geometry Interchange Format (approval date: May 12, 2005)
M1.4, the Task Group on Biometric Profiles,
chaired by Mr. Fernando Podio, NIST, covers the standardization of Application
Profile projects. M1.4 serves as the US TAG to the
JTC 1 SC 37 Working Group 4 Biometric
Functional Architecture and Related Profiles. M1.4 has twenty-five
members. Twenty-three are Voting Members and two
are Advisory Members. As a response to
proposals made at the NIST's Workshop on Biometrics and E-Authentication Over
Open Networks held March 30-31, 2005, a new INCITS M1.4 Ad-Hoc Group was formed
to address the workshop recommendations and to develop
a report to INCITS M1describing suitability of biometric architectures,
requirements and recommendations for the use of biometrics at each of four
authentication levels defined in Office of Management and Budget’s
Memorandum OMB M-04-04, E-Authentication Guidance for Federal
Agencies (assuming
biometrics would be allowed for each of these authentication
levels).
The Terms of reference for the M1.4 Ad-Hoc Group on
Biometrics and E-Authentication are in document
M1/05-0274 at the M1 document register: http://www.incits.org/tc_home/m1htm/docs/m1docreg.htm
During this reporting period M1.4 has
been developing the following "D" projects:
1566-M INCITS 383 American National
Standard for Information technology - Application Profile -
Interoperability and Data Interchange - Biometric Based Verification and
Identification of Transportation Workers - Amendment 1
1575-D Information technology - Application Profile for Point-of-Sale Biometric Verification/Identification
1676-D Information technology - Application Profile - Interoperability and Data Interchange - DoD Implementations
1706-D Information technology
- Application Profile for Commercial Biometric Physical Access
Control
M1.4 has maintenance responsibility for the following "M" projects:
1566-M INCITS 383 American National
Standard for Information technology - Application Profile -
Interoperability and Data Interchange - Biometric Based Verification and
Identification of Transportation Workers - Amendment 1
1567-D INCITS 394 American National Standard
for Information technology - Application
Profile for Interoperability, Data Interchange and Data Integrity of Biometric
Based Personal Identification for Border Management
M1.5 is the Task Group on Biometric
Performance Testing and Reporting, chaired by Mr. John Neumann, US Dept.
of Homeland Security (DHS/TSA). It handles the standardization of biometric
performance metric definitions and calculations, approaches to test performance
and requirements for reporting the results of these tests. M1.5 serves as the US
TAG to the JTC 1 SC 37 Working Group 5 Biometric Testing and Reporting. M1.5 has twenty-five members. Twenty one are Voting
Members and four are Advisory members. M1.5 is responsible for the
development of a Multi-Part Standard on Biometric Performance Testing and
Reporting ("D" project):
1602-D Information technology - Multi-Part Standard
on Biometric Performance Testing and Reporting:
Part 1: Principles and Framework
Part 2: Biometric Testing Methodologies
Part 3: Scenarion Testing Methodologies
Part 4: Operational Testing Methodologies
Part 5: Framework for Biometric Device Performance Evaluation for Access Control
M1.6, the Task Group on Cross
Jurisdictional and Societal Issues, chaired by Mr. Steven Yonkers, US
Dept. of Homeland Security, addresses the study and standardization of technical
solutions to societal aspects of biometric implementations. Excluded from the
TG's scope is the specification of policies, the limitation of usage, or
imposition of non-technical requirements on the implementations of biometric
technologies, applications, or systems. M1.6 serves as the US TAG to the JTC 1
SC 37 Working Group 6 Cross-Jurisdictional and Societal Issues. M1.6 has five
voting members. M1.6 has responsibility for a "L" project:
1723-L - Information technology - Multi-part technical
Report on Cross Jurisdictional and Socvietal Aspects of Implementations of
Biometric Technologies
As a result of these activities, the current INCITS
M1 program of work is as follows:
|
|
"D" Projects Under Development |
"S" Projects |
"L" projects |
"M" Projects |
Published Standards |
Total |
|
INCITS M1 |
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
M1.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M1.2 |
1 |
|
6 (8 subprojects) |
2 |
2 |
9 |
|
M1.3 |
7/(5 subprojects) |
|
1 (11 subprojects) |
6 |
6 |
14 |
|
M1.4 |
4 |
|
1 (3 subprojects) |
2 |
2 |
7 |
|
M1.5 |
1 (5 subprojects) |
|
1 (5 subprojects) |
|
|
2 |
|
M1.6 |
|
|
1 (TR) |
|
|
1 |
|
TOTAL |
13 |
1 |
10 |
|
10 |
36 |
As shown above, INCITS M1 and its
TGs have completed a number of standards during the previous and this reporting
period. A significant achievement
of this Technical Commitee is the adoption of many of the biometrics standards
that have been developed by INCITS M1 and JTC 1 SC 37 by large organizations
within the US and abroad. In addition, during the last two reporting
periods the INCITS M1 officers received the following awards: 2003 Gene Milligan
Award for Effective Committee Management given to the INCITS M1 officers and the
INCITS Team Award to the team of editors of INCITS M1 that during 2004
significantly contributed to the publication of seven biometric standards
and assisted INCITS M1 and JTC 1 SC 37 in meeting the requirements of their
ambitious programs of work.
National Work
Of the eight approved INCITS standards developed by M1 six (five biometric data interchange formats and one biometric application profile) were approved during the previous reporting period and two (one additional biometric data interchange format and one biometric application profile) were approved during this reporting period as shown above.
Standards developed by INCITS M1 are starting to be required in major
government programs. Attachment A of the Transportation Worker Identification
Credential (TWIC) - Phase III - Prototype Phase - Requirements Document
(DHS/TSA) for example, requires, INCITS biometric standards (as applicable) such
as INCITS 383 Information technology
- Application Profile - Interoperability and Data Interchange - Biometric
Based Verification and Identification of Transportation Workers. This biometric
application profile is the first approved biometric profile wordwide. DoD
requires conformance to the BioAPI specification and CBEFF, the Common Biometric
Exchange Framework Format specification. Both BioAPI and CBEFF were proposed by
the US as candidate international standards. Their augmented and revised version
reached FDIS status. It is expected that adoption of standards developed by
INCITS M1 will significantly increase in the near future. There are still
projects in the pipeline that should reap big payoffs. The biometric application
profiles are a crucial level of standardization to ensure biometric
interoperability. They reflect the base standards approved or under development
in INCITS M1 and specify what options and ranges of values in those base
standards are necessary and sufficient to ensure biometric interoperability for
a particular set of application functions. In addition to the two Biometric
Application Profiles already approved, the other application profiles within the
INCITS M1 program of work (Application Profiles for Point-of-Sale Biometric
Verification/Identification, DoD Implementations, and Commercial Biometric
Physical Access Control) will be equally significant in supporting their
targeted enterprise systems and applications based upon consensus biometric
standards.
In addition to developing the
national standards in the INCITS M1 program of work, INCITS M1 is a major
technical contributor to the projects in the JTC 1 SC 37 - Biometrics program of
work. The accelerated pace imposed on National Bodies in JTC 1 SC 37 has
resulted in significant progress in this SC since its inception in June 2002.
INCITS M1 has subtantially contributed to many of the SC 37 projects by
providing multiple technical contributions and offering experts for a number of
positions (e.g., editors, co-editors, Rapporteur Group members, technical expert
teams). SC 37 finalized four parts of the biometric data interchange standard
(finger minutia and finger image data interchange formats, face and iris data
interchange formats). These documents are awaiting publication as International
Standards. SC 37 has rapidly advanced three other documents to FDIS status
(BioAPI, CBEFF and Part 1 of the Performance Testing and Reporting standard). It
is anticipated that these biometric standards will also be published during
2005. Additionally, the completion of three FDIS ballots is anticipated by the
end of this year. These accomplishments have been achieved through the
dedication of many NB experts including INCITS M1 and Liaison
experts.
A measure of the market relevance of JTC 1 SC 37 is that two major
international organizations require conformance to some of the standards under
development in JTC 1 SC 37:
International Civil
Aviation Administration (ICAO)
ICAO adopted a global, harmonized blueprint for the integration of biometric identification information into passports and other Machine Readable Travel Documents (MRTD). Facial recognition was selected as the globally interoperable biometric for machine-assisted identity confirmation with MRTD. ICAO requires conformance to the face recognition standard developed by JTC1 SC 37. Other requirements for JTC 1 SC37 standards are the fingerprint data interchange formats, the iris recognition interchange format, and the Common Biometric Exchange Formats Framework (CBEFF).
The International Labor Office of the UN
(ILO)
ILO’s requirements for the
Seafarers’ ID Card include the use of two fingerprint templates to be stored in
a barcode which will be placed in the area indicated by the ICAO’s 9303
standard. ILO requirements also specify the use of some of the standards under
development in JTC 1 SC37, specifically finger minutiae and finger image data
interchange formats and CBEFF. Both the finger minutiae and finger image data
interchange formats successfully completed FDIS ballots and are expected to be
published as ISs before year end.
Level of Effort
The significant progress made during this period,
both nationally and internationally, represents thousands of hours of work
by dedicated volunteer officers, editors, and contributors to both the national
and international projects. Over 500 national documents have been prepared by
INCITS M1 members during this period supporting the technical and administrative
activities of the INCITS M1 committee. The work of INCITS and INCITS M1
and its related counterpart (JTC 1 SC 37) has been publicized in many technical
conferences through talks given by INCITS M1 officers and other members. Members
from other JTC 1 SC 37 NBs have also given talks that included discussion of
aspects of the JTC 1 SC 37's program of work. Recent publications on JTC 1 SC 37
work include an article in ISO Management Systems magazine within the magazine's
Business Standards section: "Security concerns
fuel boom in biometric technologies", written by Elizabeth
Gasiorowski-Denis (July-August 2004) and an article in ISO Focus, “International Biometric
Standards - Addressing Customer Needs for Personal Authentication” published
November 2004.
Adoption of biometric-based
high performance, interoperable systems will depend, in part, on the timely
availability of a portfolio of biometric standards that are required by
end-users, the IT personal authentication industry and other standards bodies
within INCITS such as INCITS B10 and CS1 and other outside standards
organizations. INCITS M1 and its Task Groups mitigate this risk through the use
of IT tools, cooperation with users and other standards committees, an excellent
group of officers and experts, team work and tight program management.
The challenge presented by the
accelerated development pace has been met by the INCITS M1 membership. INCITS M1
needs to further increase its membership, however, to address different aspects
of its program of work (e.g., performance and confromance testing methology
standards and possible future standards work in multi-biometric systems, the
amednments of some of the data interchange standards and the development of new
biometric application profiles that would meet the needs of specific user
communities). User's participation has significantly increased. This led to the
rapid completion of the second Biometric Application Profile (Border
Management). Gaps in the program of work include work related to speaker
recognition technology and other conformance testing methodology
standards.
The accelerated pace of INCITS M1
activities has extended in part to liaison efforts as well. The biometric
experts in INCITS M1 are contributing to related work in other national and
international activities. Internationally, JTC 1 SC 37 has requested
participation in a collaborative effort between JTC 1 SC 27 and ISO TC 68 in the
development of the international standard equivalent to X9.84 (ISO/IEC CD
19092). Technical contributions were developed by JTC 1 SC 37 experts and sent
to TC 68. Although a formal collaborative effort was not achieved, the SC 37
experts have still contributed to the work of 19092 through liaison
contributions. JTC 1 SC 37 technical experts are also contributing with two
projects under development in JTC 1 SC 27: 19790 “Information technology –
Security techniques – Security requirements for cryptographic modules” and 19792
“Information technology – A Framework for security evaluation and testing of
biometric technologies”. INCITS M1 experts are collaborating in these efforts
together with experts from other NBs represented in JTC 1 SC 37. Further
harmonization of biometric and related technology standards between the INCITS
M1 program of work and developments in other standards bodies will also require
major efforts from the INCITS M1 experts. INCITS M1 members are expected to
contribute with their expertise in supporting other biometric-related projects
within SC27 directly through a strong and close liaisonship with INCITS CS1 and
through member's participation in experts teams within JTC 1 SC 37. The initial
accelerated pace of international biometric standards development in JTC 1 SC 37
also presents a major challenge. JTC 1 SC 37 was operating on a 5 month cycle (5
months between SG/WG meeetings and 10 months between Plenaries). Now the
schedule has been relaxed to 6 - 7 months between WG meetings. The JTC 1 SC 37
schedule imposes great demands on INCITS M1 member organizations, editors,
technical contributors and officers (as well as imposing great demands on
experts from other NBs represented in JTC 1 SC 37).
|
Meeting Number |
Date |
Location |
|
INCITS M1 and TG meetings
collocated AHGEMS
(6th)* AHGIHCABS (2nd)
INCITS M1.1 (2nd) INCITS M1.2
(8th) INCITS M1.3 AHGGCTM
|
|
Bethesda, MD |
| INCITS M1.3 Ad-Hoc Group on Biometric
Sample Quality (7th)* |
February 3, 2005 |
Teleconference |
|
INCITS M1 and TG meetings
collocated AHGEMS (7th)* AHGIHCABS (3rd)*
INCITS M1.1
(3rd) INCITS M1.3 AHGGCTM
|
February 25, 2005 February 23, 2005 February 23, 2005 February 22-23, 2005 February 21-22, 2005 February 21, 2005 February 23-24, 2005 February 21-22, 2005 February 24, 2005 |
Miami, FL |
AHGEMS: INCITS M1 Ad-Hoc Group on Evaluating Multi-Biometric Systems
(*) These
AHGs have been re-authorized every 2 meetings of M1.
Meeting Number
Date
Location
INCITS M1 and TG meetings collocated
INCITS M1 (15th)
AHGEMS (8th)*
INCITS M1.4 (10th)
INCITS M1.1 (4th)
INCITS M1.2 (10th)
INCITS M1.3 (12th)
AHGBEA (1st)INCITS M1.5 (9th)
INCITS M1.6 (5th)
June 9-10, 2005
June 6, 2005
June 7, 2005
June 7-8, 2005
June 8-9, 2005
June 6, 2005
June 7-8, 2005
June 7-8, 2005Cherry Hill, NJ INCITS M1.4 AHGBEA (2nd) September 21, 2005
(Colocated with the Biometric Consortium Conference)Crystal City, VA INCITS M1 and TG meetings collocated
INCITS M1 (16th)AHGEMS (9th)
INCITS M1.1
INCITS M1.2
INCITS M1.3INCITS M1.4
INCITS M1.5
INCITS M1.6Week of October 3-7, 2005
INCITS M1 and TG meetings collocated
INCITS M1 (17th)INCITS M1.1
INCITS M1.2
INCITS M1.3
INCITS M1.4AHGBEA (3rd)INCITS M1.5
INCITS M1.6Week of December 12-16, 2005
AHGEMS:
INCITS M1 Ad-Hoc Group on Evaluating Multi-Biometric Systems
(*) This AHG has
been re-authorized every 2 meetings of M1.
INCITS M1 maintains liaison with
the following organizations to keep them abreast of INCITS M1 products,
developments and positions and to address, as applicable, biometric-related
issues within their national and international activities:
The technologies addressed by
INCITS B10 and INCITS M1 are, for some applications, complementary in nature.
The potential contribution of INCITS M1 to the JTC 1 SC 17 projects (through
INCITS B10) is apparent. In particular is the utilization of biometric data
within travel documents and ID cards. Close and timely collaboration between
these two INCITS TCs is maintained. For more information about INCITS B10 see
http://www.incits.org/tc_home/b10.htm
Strong synergy exists between biometrics and IT
security. The complementary nature of both programs of work led to close
collaboration between experts from both TCs. INCITS M1 maintains an active
collaboration wtih INCITS T4. For more information about INCITS T4 see
http://www.incits.org/tc_home/t4.htm
Current INCITS V2 activities may lead to collaboration opportunities with INCITS M1. Potential contributions of INCITS M1 to INCITS V2 work are possible in the next period. In particular, related to the utilization of biometric technologies and biometric data within the applications of interest to INCITS V2. For more information about INCITS V2 see http://www.incits.org/tc_home/v2.htm
The BioAPI Consortium was formed to develop a widely available and widely accepted Application Programming Interface to serve any type of biometric technology. It has over 100 members from industry and other organizations. Additional information about the BioAPI Consortium can be found at http://www.bioapi.org/
The membership
lists for INCITS M1 and its TGs are available on the INCITS M1 website under "members". The
officers of INCITS M1 and its TGs are shown below.
a.
|
Position (and training date) |
Name and organization represented |
|
INCITS M1.1 Chair (appointed 08/20/04) |
Stephen J. Elliott USAPurdue University 307 Knoy, Dept. of Industrial Technology West Lafayette, IN 47907 |
|
Position (and training date) |
Name and organization represented |
INCITS M1.2 Chair(appointed 03/14/03)ANSI delegates' training in 2002 |
Fred HerrThe Biometric Foundation65 Douglas RoadLamsbale, PA 19446USA |
| INCITS M1.2 Vice
Chair (appointed 05/06/04) |
Wayne Kyle Biocom, LLC 952 Echo Lane, Suite 322 Houston TX 77024 USA |
|
Position (and training date) |
Name and organization represented |
|
INCITS M1.3 Chair (appointed 03/14/03) |
Creed Jones
Sagem Morpho, Inc.1145 Broadway Plaza, #200Tacoma, WA 98402USA |
INCITS M1.3 Vice Chair(appointed 06/09/03) |
James CambierIridian Technologies121 Whittendale Drive, Suite B Moorestown, NJ 08057 USA |
|
INCITS M1.3 Secretary |
Greg CannonCross Match Technologies, Inc.Address 3960 RCA Blvd.Suite 5001 Palm Beach Gardens , FL 33410 USA |
|
Position (and training date) |
Name and organization represented |
|
INCITS M1.4 Chair (appointed 03/14/03) |
Fernando L. Podio National Institute of Standards and Technology 100 Bureau Dr., MS 8951 Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8951 USA |
|
Secretary (appointed 05/05/04) |
Dale Hapeman DoD Biometric management Offcie (Booz Allen Hamilton) 347 West Main Street Clarsburg, WV 26301 USA |
|
Position (and training date) |
Name and organization represented |
INCITS M1.5 Chair(appointed 05/05/04) |
John
Neumann
|
INCITS M1.5 Vice Chair(appointed 08/19/03) |
Michael
Thieme International Biometric Group One Battery Park Plaza, Ground Floor New York, NY 10004 USA |
|
Position (and training date) |
Name and organization represented |
|
Previous INCITS M1.6 Chair (01/16/04 -
02/24/05)
|
Bradford
Wing
US-Visit PMO |
Current INCITS M1.6
Chair(appointed 02/14/05) |
Steven
Yonkers Washington, DC 20528 |
|
NCITS M1.3 Secretary |
Mark Visbal Security Industry Association 635 Slaters Lane, Suite 110 Alexandria VA 2314-1177 |
Deploying new information technology systems for
homeland security will require a comprehensive set of both national and
international technically sound standards for biometrics that meet the U.S.
needs. Biometric technologies are already playing a crucial role in a wide range
of applications. Standardized
biometric-based solutions are becoming a mandatory requirement in many of these
applications. In addition to supporting homeland security and
preventing ID fraud, biometric-based solutions are able to provide for
confidential financial transactions and personal data privacy. Enterprise-wide
network security infrastructures, the protection of buildings from unauthorized
individuals, employee IDs, secure electronic banking, investing and other
financial transactions, retail sales, law enforcement, and health and social
services are already benefiting from these technologies. A range of new
applications can be found in such diverse environments as amusement parks,
banks, mobile devices, passport programs and driver licenses, colleges, and
school lunch programs. Biometric technologies are being required in multiple
government and commercial applications.
The importance of biometric
technologies has dramatically increased because of the events of September 11,
2001. Homeland defense is now the highest of priorities for many countries.
These countries are now seriously considering or have already approved new
legislation that calls for the investigation and use of biometric technologies
as soon as possible for homeland defense applications. The prevention of ID
theft will also become a significant market for biometrics in the future. A
project for the development of an INCITS Technical Report on how
biometrics (and biometrcis standards-based solutions) can support the prevention
of ID Theft is being proposed for consideration at the June
meeting of M1.
Accounting for systems
developers, resellers and the influence that biometrics will have in other
industries and the IT industry (i.e., security industry), biometric technologies
are expected to be a substantial catalyst for the global IT market in these
applications. The expected growth of the biometrics market, however, is placing
a greater demand on the national and international biometric industry, biometric
system developers, researchers and end-users to work together to address in
cooperation a number of issues including privacy, testing and evaluation,
infrastructure, cost, scalability, open system interoperability and data
interchange and conformance to existing standards. INCITS M1 and JTC 1 SC 37’s
efforts are helping in ensuring that standards-based systems and applications
that require conformance to the biometric standards (approved or under
development) would be more interoperable, scalable, reliable, and secure.
INCITS M1 is completing the
development of the first generation of formal biometric data interchange
standards. New projects have been initiated to develop conformance testing
methodologies for the data interchange formats and industry developers and
testing laboratories are providing useful feedback to INCITS M1. Advances in
biometric technology research and development are expected to require a second
generation of standards (e..g, 3-D face, biometric application profiles).
The INCITS M1 portofolio is expected to grow. INCITS M1's current work in
multi-biometrics is expected to lead to new standards projects related to this
important area. A new biometric data interchange format for keystroke dynamics
is being proposed for consideration. The demand for enhanced data structures and
interfaces to support multimodal/multibiometrics and secure authentication is
expected to led to new projects within INCITS M1.
Industry consortia remain an
important source of new standards activities. INCITS M1 will continue to
rely on standards incubators such as the Biometric Consortium as a source of
guidance and specifications. We have seen at least one case
recently that elected to use INCITS fast-track standardization as the primary
mechanism for carrying the documents forward into the standards world. The
augmented version of CBEFF (NISTIR 6529-A), as discussed above, has been
sucessfully fast tracked through INCITS and became an INCITS standard during
2005.
The heavy workload and highly technical environments
associated with our activities led to the establishment of Ad-Hocs to respond to
specific needs required to meet the international agenda within JTC 1 SC 37 and
to address aspects of the national program (e.g., INCITS M1 Ad-Hoc Group on
Issues for Harmonizing Conformity Assessment to Biometric Standards, INCITS
M1.3
Ad Hoc Committee on Generalized Conformance Testing Methodologies and INCITS
M1.3 Ad-Hoc Group on Biometric Sample Quality). These required activities
have also led to some electronic meetings
(this approach has mainly been used for some of the Ad-Hoc meetings). However,
most of the TG meetings and all of the INCITS M1 meetings, have been physical
meetings.
INCITS M1 meeting activities are financed and hosted by
volunteer organizations. The individual participants and their member
organizations finance all travel, room, and related business expenses. INCITS M1
has no direct financial activities.
Web-based/electronic
document distribution procedures:
From its inception in November 2001 INCITS M1 has
operated through electronic document distribution (INCITS M1 reflector for
members). All INCITS M1 documents are posted in a web-based document
register. Documents are posted in the document register by INCITS personnel.
INCITS M1 and INCITS M1 TG officers have access to an automated document
numbering system.
The full details (company, address, phone, e-mail etc.)
of INCITS M1 and INCITS M1 TG officers are available on-line through the INCITS
web site. At the present time INCITS M1 does not have a web-based Letter Ballot
scheme in place. The INCITS M1 officers are responsible for issuing the
INCITS M1 letter ballots electronically through the INCITS M1 email
reflector.
Documents for each meeting (INCITS M1 and its TGs) are
posted in advance according to the INCITS rules and offered to the INCITS M1
membership in ZIPPED files posted in the INCITS M1 web site before the meetings.
JTC 1 SC 37 documents can be downloaded through Livelink.
INCITS Staff and the JTC 1 SC 37 Secretariat are doing a great job keeping up with demands of national and international accelerated standards development schedules.
One of the concerns that the INCITS M1 membership has is on the INCITS rules. INCITS M1 members' perspective is that it takes an un-initiated person too many meetings to comprehend them. The INCITS M1 and its TG officers need more clear INCITS voting tables and also needed are flow charts for everyone to know where they are in the development process. INCITS M1 perspective is that more user friendly RDs, including the descriptive part of the rules describing the milestones (not intermixing rules related to national and international projects would help significantly the operations) be developed. A "beginning to end flowchart", text based on the flow chart, and mapping of the above into the voting tables would also greatly improve the understanding and applicability of the rules.